Stopping the Ape and Moving Forward to Nature

I’ve spent most of my professional life trying to help people appreciate nature. In the field of nature interpretation, you try to provoke interest in a meaningful way. You only get a few seconds of a viewer’s time, but if you do a good job, you will have ignited a spark of natural curiosity and hopefully they will walk away wanting to learn more on their own.

A wetland illustration I did for Idaho Power Company.

I started this blog and wrote my young-adult novel as an extension of my profession, as a way to take people and especially children, deeper into nature. I’ve been lucky in my career—getting to spend time illustrating and writing about fascinating animals and plants and ecological relationships. But anyone working with environmental subjects knows it can get depressing, too…for obvious reasons. And in interpretation circles, we have begun to realize we have yet another type of threat to nature. In my neighborhood in West Seattle, that threat recently appeared into the middle of Lincoln Park, a magical place of towering firs and cedars, sweeping views of Puget Sound and the Olympic Range, beaches, and a thriving community of plants, wildlife and people. It’s a terrible plan and has infuriated a lot of people, but I worry it may be just the tip of the iceberg.

A watercolor sketch of the beach at Lincoln Park with Puget Sound, the Olympics and rain.

 

In interpretation, you learn very quickly that it doesn’t work to talk only about plants and animals. You have to get personal—show your audience how nature relates directly to them. Let’s face it, we’re all pretty stuck on ourselves.

But, most of our audience used to come pre-packaged with a simple love of nature, usually something they acquired in childhood, and it wasn’t that hard to spark their interest and curiosity. Sadly, the baby-boomers were probably the last full generation of Americans that grew up running wild in nature…climbing trees and stomping through creeks, turning over logs and jumping off rocks…sometimes getting into trouble, most times getting ourselves out of it. We learned a lot from those experiences—that nature was a place of exciting discovery, a place where we could test ourselves, work things out alone or in cooperation with our friends, and explore a world of other creatures that share the planet.

 

A child alone in the woods…almost never seen anymore.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A few decades ago, our society seemed to have decided practically overnight that the world, and nature in particular, had become a much too dangerous place for children to roam freely. Kids today spend most of their time indoors and plugged in, or in highly structured and supervised activities. Too often, they are not given the opportunity to develop the deep love of nature that we did. Add to that the depressing and overwhelming messages of “Planet Earth is Dying, and YOU Must Save it!” underlying most anything to do with the environment these days, and you have one big societal push straight indoors.

 

Nature Deficit Disorder

Richard Louv has studied and written extensively about this social condition in his book “The Last Child in the Woods”. As a society, over-hyped media reports and other manufactured fears literally scared Americans out of the woods. Louv now writes and lectures about the physical and emotional ills caused by lack of daily, unstructured outdoor activity and contact with nature. Obesity, depression, and behavioral problems have been conclusively linked to what he has termed “Nature Deficit Disorder”, a non-medical condition that many of us, especially children, suffer from. Turns out, daily contact with nature is very much a basic human need.

Now nature interpreters are realizing our jobs are getting more difficult—our audience just got a lot tougher. We still only get 3 seconds to make our case for nature, but now we must communicate it to a group of people that society has been conditioning to look for solace, entertainment, and meaning almost anywhere but in nature. Younger generations know a lot about science and nature and the environment…but the value of just being in nature seems lost on many of them.

 

The Ape

It’s sad that a corporation specializing in high-impact recreation installations—mostly built in city and town parks across the world, in remnant forests or natural areas of financially strapped communities—named itself GoApe. I cannot think of a more insensitive name choice than ape—one of the most imperiled forest-dwelling family of animals on the planet. Apes are symbols of so much that is wrong with the world…all of it human-caused. I think it says something about a company that is essentially a forest resource-extraction interest to choose such a name.

 

This illustration was used by the opposition to the Go Ape proposal.

 

For background on GoApe’s high-impact development scheme for Lincoln Park, visit: West Seattle Blog

Last night, a furious group of over 200 Seattlites met with the community to fight this proposal. Many of us left the meeting with the hope the whole thing will be canceled, and soon. But even if GoApe packs up and leaves today, the threat of another Ape remains.

(Or maybe a Goape or an Aype would be more fitting as a symbol…I envision a giant troll-like creature.)

I noted in last nights’ meeting that most of the protestors were over thirty years old. The Parks Department said that they were looking to provide “new modes of recreation” that young people are demanding these days. Apparently this translates as high-impact, high-adrenaline, and high-cost modes of eco-tainment—the kind people demand who never learned to love just plain old rocks and sticks and streams and trees.

So, the disturbing question is: when boomers leave the planet, and if the newer generations never learn to find deep solace, wonder, and joy in nature, who will keep out the Goapes and Aypes of the future? What will happen to nature then?

 

Moving Forward to Nature

Safety

No one today would dare tell you that urban parks offer guaranteed safety. But they are surely as safe or safer than anywhere else in the city, including parking lots, schools, malls, and most especially, anywhere inside a moving vehicle. At some point, we are going to have to get realistic about safety.

 

Making Nature Fun Again

We have to stop sending so many depressing You Must Save Planet Earth messages to children. When I first thought about ideas for my novel The Hollow Cedar, I decided to keep the environmental message very subtle and in the background. Mostly, I just wanted kids to be able to read a fun story that takes place in nature — to transport them into an entirely new and fascinating place. My characters go deep into nature, are faced with threats and dangers and challenges, learn about working together to solve problems, and find out they are a lot stronger and smarter than they realized. It’s not a substitute for actual nature-experiences, but it may awaken a curious little mind or two.

 

When I researched my novel, I found that Suz Lipman hosts The Children in Nature Network and learned that there is a growing movement all over the world to get kids back into nature. Find out more here:

Children & Nature Network

Richard Louv

 

5 thoughts on “Stopping the Ape and Moving Forward to Nature

  1. Pingback: Your View is Ruining My Trees | Denise Dahn, artist/writer

    • Thanks Pat! That means a lot coming from you!
      (for those of you who don’t know Pat, she has a admirable – and colorful – past as an activist, and a wonderful presence as a nature writer and advocate.)

  2. Well said Denise! There are so few places in the city left in their “wild” state. Lincoln Park is one such gem marked by old growth forest, natural undergrowth and habitat to many birds. It would be tragic to lose all that it offers and to create such a precedent – where would it stop…

    • Thanks Karen!
      More and more of us will live in cities as we move into the future, and it is important that we have wild or semi-wild places to retreat to.

      Most great cities in the world, New York, London, are able to function as they do because they designated and preserved semi-wild spaces for their citizens. Seattle, (to me, the greatest city!) has wonderful natural spaces, but I fear they will be targets for high-impact use if we don’t actively preserve them.

Leave a Reply to dahndesign Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *